WGU Secure-Software-Design Reliable Exam Answers For instance, the online version can support any electronic equipment and it is not limited to all electronic equipment, WGU Secure-Software-Design Reliable Exam Answers When you are visiting on our website, you can find that every button is easy to use and has a swift response, Now, if you use Secure-Software-Design preparation materials, you only need to learn twenty to thirty hours to go to the exam, Once people mention the Secure-Software-Design exam, most of them will feel unhappy and depressed.
This includes very common programs such as Adobe Acrobat Reader, OpenOffice Updated CSCP Testkings and a variety of other add-ons that people may have on their computers, Please visit the author's site at railstutorial.org.
In our case, we would select the `ImageRotator` Secure-Software-Design Valid Test Discount extender to associate it with the image control, Application developers, security professionals, software vendors, and compliance auditors have Secure-Software-Design Exam Voucher the ability to access a consistent language and definitions for web security-related issues.
Using reengineering, businesses around the world have systematically Reliable Secure-Software-Design Exam Answers retooled their processes-achieving dramatic cost savings, greater customer satisfaction, and more value.
Potential candidates may request to join Exam SC-900 Preview the program by submitting a complete application, and if selected, will be contacted with next steps for participation, Latest C_S4CFI_2504 Test Labs It's also one reason why designers are told to minimize distractions on the web.
Quiz Valid WGU - Secure-Software-Design - WGUSecure Software Design (KEO1) Exam Reliable Exam Answers
Relational databases and how to go about accessing and storing data Reliable Secure-Software-Design Exam Answers in a relational database, Welcome to Visual QuickStart month at Peachpit Press, Participate in the disaster recovery process/drills.
A Number Speller, Technology new infrastructure is enabling new business https://actualtorrent.pdfdumps.com/Secure-Software-Design-valid-exam.html models, making it easier to reach and serve niche markets and reducing the costs of starting and operating a small business.
The Encyclopedia of Operations Management: A Field Manual Reliable Secure-Software-Design Exam Answers and Glossary of Operations Management Terms and Concepts, You don't know the whole process of the exam.
Or they might help you come up with a question that you want to pose Ok-Life-Accident-and-Health-or-Sickness-Producer Latest Torrent on thePumrova comment portal or ask me by email, This subjective basis, the regenerative power of imagination, is purely empirical.
For instance, the online version can support any electronic equipment and it Reliable Secure-Software-Design Exam Answers is not limited to all electronic equipment, When you are visiting on our website, you can find that every button is easy to use and has a swift response.
100% Pass Secure-Software-Design - WGUSecure Software Design (KEO1) Exam Pass-Sure Reliable Exam Answers
Now, if you use Secure-Software-Design preparation materials, you only need to learn twenty to thirty hours to go to the exam, Once people mention the Secure-Software-Design exam, most of them will feel unhappy and depressed.
One-year free update Secure-Software-Design latest dumps, We are a responsible company concentrating on the profession of the Secure-Software-Design exam bootcamp and after-sales services for over ten years.
And the increasingly expending number of our users of Secure-Software-Design original questions is another forceful prove that we have the superior strength of helping candidates get through the exam and we do spare no effort to sweep out any problems which each one of our users of Secure-Software-Design exam prep put forward.
Our Secure-Software-Design preparation quide will totally amaze you and bring you good luck, More importantly, the updating system of our company is free for all customers, So in order to improve the chance of being chosen whether about work condition or for self-development, especially the Secure-Software-Design practice exam ahead of you right now, our company make the most effective and high quality Secure-Software-Design verified questions for you.
As we all know, the best way to gain confidence Reliable Secure-Software-Design Exam Answers is to do something successfully, In the present society, the workplace is extremely cruel, We have occupied in this business for years, and the website and the Secure-Software-Design study guide of our company is of good reputation.
Besides, they also add the new updates as supplements Reliable Secure-Software-Design Exam Answers for your reference, And what is the opportunity, Give me a chance, I send you a success.
NEW QUESTION: 1
You are the Office 365 administrator for your company. You have a workstation that runs Windows 8.
You need to install the prerequisite components so that you can view mail protection reports on the workstation.
Which two items must you install? Each correct answer presents part of the solution.
A. Microsoft Access 2013
B. .NET Framework 4.5
C. Microsoft Connectivity Analyzer Tool
D. Microsoft Excel 2013
E. SQL Server Analysis Services
Answer: B,D
Explanation:
To view the Mail Protection Reports for Office 365 on your computer, you need to install the
"Microsoft Excel plugin for Exchange Online Reporting" component which is a free download from Microsoft.
The "Microsoft Excel plugin for Exchange Online Reporting" component has the following system requirements:
Supported Operating System:
* Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows Server 2008
Required Software:
* Microsoft Office Excel 2013
Additional Requirements:
* Microsoft .NET Framework 4.5
* Microsoft Online Services Sign-In Assistant (for Exchange Online Protection customers only)
* An Office 365 subscription that contains Exchange Online or Exchange Online Protection
* Email address you use to sign in to Office 365
NEW QUESTION: 2
A. Option D
B. Option C
C. Option B
D. Option A
Answer: C
NEW QUESTION: 3
A. 16-bit
B. 32-bit
C. 8-bit
D. 64-bit
Answer: D
NEW QUESTION: 4
Which of the following is NOT an example of corrective control?
A. Contingency planning
B. OS Upgrade
C. System Monitoring
D. Backup and restore
Answer: C
Explanation:
Explanation/Reference:
Explanation:
The word NOT is used as a keyword in the question. You need to find out a security control from a given options which in not corrective control. System Monitoring is a detective control and not a corrective control. For your exam you should know below information about different security controls Deterrent Controls
Deterrent Controls are intended to discourage a potential attacker. Access controls act as a deterrent to threats and attacks by the simple fact that the existence of the control is enough to keep some potential attackers from attempting to circumvent the control. This is often because the effort required to circumvent the control is far greater than the potential reward if the attacker is successful, or, conversely, the negative implications of a failed attack (or getting caught) outweigh the benefits of success. For example, by forcing the identification and authentication of a user, service, or application, and all that it implies, the potential for incidents associated with the system is significantly reduced because an attacker will fear association with the incident. If there are no controls for a given access path, the number of incidents and the potential impact become infinite. Controls inherently reduce exposure to risk by applying oversight for a process.
This oversight acts as a deterrent, curbing an attacker's appetite in the face of probable repercussions.
The best example of a deterrent control is demonstrated by employees and their propensity to intentionally perform unauthorized functions, leading to unwanted events. When users begin to understand that by authenticating into a system to perform a function, their activities are logged and monitored, and it reduces the likelihood they will attempt such an action. Many threats are based on the anonymity of the threat agent, and any potential for identification and association with their actions is avoided at all costs. It is this fundamental reason why access controls are the key target of circumvention by attackers. Deterrents also take the form of potential punishment if users do something unauthorized. For example, if the organization policy specifies that an employee installing an unauthorized wireless access point will be fired, that will determine most employees from installing wireless access points.
Preventative Controls
Preventive controls are intended to avoid an incident from occurring. Preventative access controls keep a user from performing some activity or function. Preventative controls differ from deterrent controls in that the control is not optional and cannot (easily) be bypassed.
Deterrent controls work on the theory that it is easier to obey the control rather than to risk the consequences of bypassing the control. In other words, the power for action resides with the user (or the attacker). Preventative controls place the power of action with the system, obeying the control is not optional. The only way to bypass the control is to find a flaw in the control's implementation.
Compensating Controls
Compensating controls are introduced when the existing capabilities of a system do not support the requirement of a policy. Compensating controls can be technical, procedural, or managerial. Although an existing system may not support the required controls, there may exist other technology or processes that can supplement the existing environment, closing the gap in controls, meeting policy requirements, and reducing overall risk. For example, the access control policy may state that the authentication process must be encrypted when performed over the Internet. Adjusting an application to natively support encryption for authentication purposes may be too costly. Secure Socket Layer (SSL), an encryption protocol, can be employed and layered on top of the authentication process to support the policy statement.
Other examples include a separation of duties environment, which offers the capability to isolate certain tasks to compensate for technical limitations in the system and ensure the security of transactions. In addition, management processes, such as authorization, supervision, and administration, can be used to compensate for gaps in the access control environment.
Detective Controls
Detective controls warn when something has happened, and are the earliest point in the post incident timeline. Access controls are a deterrent to threats and can be aggressively utilized to prevent harmful incidents through the application of least privilege. However, the detective nature of access controls can provide significant visibility into the access environment and help organizations manage their access strategy and related security risk. As mentioned previously, strongly managed access privileges provided to an authenticated user offer the ability to reduce the risk exposure of the enterprise's assets by limiting the capabilities that authenticated user has. However, there are few options to control what a user can perform once privileges are provided. For example, if a user is provided write access to a file and that file is damaged, altered, or otherwise negatively impacted (either deliberately or unintentionally), the use of applied access controls will offer visibility into the transaction.
The control environment can be established to log activity regarding the identification, authentication, authorization, and use of privileges on a system. This can be used to detect the occurrence of errors, the attempts to perform an unauthorized action, or to validate when provided credentials were exercised. The logging system as a detective device provides evidence of actions (both successful and unsuccessful) and tasks that were executed by authorized users.
Corrective Controls
When a security incident occurs, elements within the security infrastructure may require corrective actions.
Corrective controls are actions that seek to alter the security posture of an environment to correct any deficiencies and return the environment to a secure state. A security incident signals the failure of one or more directive, deterrent, preventative, or compensating controls. The detective controls may have triggered an alarm or notification, but now the corrective controls must work to stop the incident in its tracks. Corrective controls can take many forms, all depending on the particular situation at hand or the particular security failure that needs to be dealt with.
Recovery Controls
Any changes to the access control environment, whether in the face of a security incident or to offer temporary compensating controls, need to be accurately reinstated and returned to normal operations.
There are several situations that may affect access controls, their applicability, status, or management.
Events can include system outages, attacks, project changes, technical demands, administrative gaps, and full-blown disaster situations. For example, if an application is not correctly installed or deployed, it may adversely affect controls placed on system files or even have default administrative accounts unknowingly implemented upon install.
Additionally, an employee may be transferred, quit, or be on temporary leave that may affect policy requirements regarding separation of duties. An attack on systems may have resulted in the implantation of a Trojan horse program, potentially exposing private user information, such as credit card information and financial data. In all of these cases, an undesirable situation must be rectified as quickly as possible and controls returned to normal operations.
For your exam you should know below information about different security controls Deterrent Controls Deterrent Controls are intended to discourage a potential attacker. Access controls act as a deterrent to threats and attacks by the simple fact that the existence of the control is enough to keep some potential attackers from attempting to circumvent the control. This is often because the effort required to circumvent the control is far greater than the potential reward if the attacker is successful, or, conversely, the negative implications of a failed attack (or getting caught) outweigh the benefits of success. For example, by forcing the identification and authentication of a user, service, or application, and all that it implies, the potential for incidents associated with the system is significantly reduced because an attacker will fear association with the incident. If there are no controls for a given access path, the number of incidents and the potential impact become infinite. Controls inherently reduce exposure to risk by applying oversight for a process.
This oversight acts as a deterrent, curbing an attacker's appetite in the face of probable repercussions.
The best example of a deterrent control is demonstrated by employees and their propensity to intentionally perform unauthorized functions, leading to unwanted events.
When users begin to understand that by authenticating into a system to perform a function, their activities are logged and monitored, and it reduces the likelihood they will attempt such an action. Many threats are based on the anonymity of the threat agent, and any potential for identification and association with their actions is avoided at all costs.
It is this fundamental reason why access controls are the key target of circumvention by attackers.
Deterrents also take the form of potential punishment if users do something unauthorized. For example, if the organization policy specifies that an employee installing an unauthorized wireless access point will be fired, that will determine most employees from installing wireless access points.
Preventative Controls
Preventive controls are intended to avoid an incident from occurring. Preventative access controls keep a user from performing some activity or function. Preventative controls differ from deterrent controls in that the control is not optional and cannot (easily) be bypassed.
Deterrent controls work on the theory that it is easier to obey the control rather than to risk the consequences of bypassing the control. In other words, the power for action resides with the user (or the attacker). Preventative controls place the power of action with the system, obeying the control is not optional. The only way to bypass the control is to find a flaw in the control's implementation.
Compensating Controls
Compensating controls are introduced when the existing capabilities of a system do not support the requirement of a policy. Compensating controls can be technical, procedural, or managerial. Although an existing system may not support the required controls, there may exist other technology or processes that can supplement the existing environment, closing the gap in controls, meeting policy requirements, and reducing overall risk.
For example, the access control policy may state that the authentication process must be encrypted when performed over the Internet. Adjusting an application to natively support encryption for authentication purposes may be too costly. Secure Socket Layer (SSL), an encryption protocol, can be employed and layered on top of the authentication process to support the policy statement.
Other examples include a separation of duties environment, which offers the capability to isolate certain tasks to compensate for technical limitations in the system and ensure the security of transactions. In addition, management processes, such as authorization, supervision, and administration, can be used to compensate for gaps in the access control environment.
Detective Controls
Detective controls warn when something has happened, and are the earliest point in the post incident timeline. Access controls are a deterrent to threats and can be aggressively utilized to prevent harmful incidents through the application of least privilege. However, the detective nature of access controls can provide significant visibility into the access environment and help organizations manage their access strategy and related security risk.
As mentioned previously, strongly managed access privileges provided to an authenticated user offer the ability to reduce the risk exposure of the enterprise's assets by limiting the capabilities that authenticated user has. However, there are few options to control what a user can perform once privileges are provided.
For example, if a user is provided write access to a file and that file is damaged, altered, or otherwise negatively impacted (either deliberately or unintentionally), the use of applied access controls will offer visibility into the transaction. The control environment can be established to log activity regarding the identification, authentication, authorization, and use of privileges on a system.
This can be used to detect the occurrence of errors, the attempts to perform an unauthorized action, or to validate when provided credentials were exercised. The logging system as a detective device provides evidence of actions (both successful and unsuccessful) and tasks that were executed by authorized users.
Corrective Controls
When a security incident occurs, elements within the security infrastructure may require corrective actions.
Corrective controls are actions that seek to alter the security posture of an environment to correct any deficiencies and return the environment to a secure state. A security incident signals the failure of one or more directive, deterrent, preventative, or compensating controls. The detective controls may have triggered an alarm or notification, but now the corrective controls must work to stop the incident in its tracks. Corrective controls can take many forms, all depending on the particular situation at hand or the particular security failure that needs to be dealt with.
Recovery Controls
Any changes to the access control environment, whether in the face of a security incident or to offer temporary compensating controls, need to be accurately reinstated and returned to normal operations.
There are several situations that may affect access controls, their applicability, status, or management.
Events can include system outages, attacks, project changes, technical demands, administrative gaps, and full-blown disaster situations. For example, if an application is not correctly installed or deployed, it may adversely affect controls placed on system files or even have default administrative accounts unknowingly implemented upon install.
Additionally, an employee may be transferred, quit, or be on temporary leave that may affect policy requirements regarding separation of duties. An attack on systems may have resulted in the implantation of a Trojan horse program, potentially exposing private user information, such as credit card information and financial data. In all of these cases, an undesirable situation must be rectified as quickly as possible and controls returned to normal operations.
References:
CISA Review Manual 2014 Page number 44
Official ISC2 CISSP guide 3rd edition Page number 50 and 51